ECRIN
ERI FEB RAS		 2019-3
Issue's contents		 russian version
RUS
previous article Regionalistica 2019 Volume 6 number 3 pages 104-109 next article

 

Title of the article Russian-American Pacific Partnership and Its 24th Annual Meeting
Pages 104-109
Author Zaostrovskikh Elena AnatolyevnaZaostrovskikh Elena Anatolyevna
Ph.D. in economics, research fellow
Economic Research Institute FEB RAS
153, Tikhookeanskaya Street, Khabarovsk, Russia, 680042
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Abstract  
Code  
DOI 10.14530/reg.2019.3.104
Keywords  
Download 2019-03.104.pdf
For citation Zaostrovskikh E.A. Russian-American Pacific Partnership and Its 24th Annual Meeting. Regionalistica [Regionalistics]. 2019. Vol. 6. No. 3. Pp. 104–109. DOI: 10.14530/reg.2019.3.104. (In Russian).
References  
Financing  
Date  
ECRIN
ERI FEB RAS		 2019-3
Issue's contents		 russian version
RUS
previous article Regionalistica 2019 Volume 6 number 3 pages 100-103 next article

 

Title of the article The Arctic – Territory of Dialogue and an Ocean of Possibilities
Pages 100-103
Author Krasnopolski Boris KhananovichKrasnopolski Boris Khananovich
doctor in economics, professor, chief researcher
Economic Research Institute FEB RAS
153, Tikhookeanskaya Street, Khabarovsk, Russia, 680042
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Abstract  
Code  
DOI 10.14530/reg.2019.3.100
Keywords  
Download 2019-03.100.pdf
For citation Krasnopolski B.K. The Arctic – Territory of Dialogue and an Ocean of Possibilities. Regionalistica [Regionalistics]. 2019. Vol. 6. No. 3. Pp. 100–103. DOI: 10.14530/reg.2019.3.100. (In Russian).
References  
Financing  
Date  
ECRIN
ERI FEB RAS		 2019-3
Issue's contents		 russian version
RUS
previous article Regionalistica 2019 Volume 6 number 3 pages 80-88 next article

Title of the article Attitude of the Residents of Buryatia to the Citizens of China: Views, Attitudes, Social Distance
Pages 80-88
Author Dashibalova Irina NikolaevnaDashibalova Irina Nikolaevna
PhD in philosophy, senior researcher
Institute of Mongolian Studies, Buddhology and Tibetology, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
6, Sakhyanovoy Street, Ulan-Ude, Russia, 670047
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Abstract This article examines the attitude of the inhabitants of Buryatia towards the Chinese living in the Republic of Buryatia and staying on the territory as labor migrants. The results of a sociological survey of 2018, based on questionnaires, focus groups and in-depth interviews, made it possible to characterize the ideas of the Buryatia population about the Chinese ethnos. Factors of interethnic perception are historical ties with citizens of the PRC, economic ties and the social background formed by the media. In the context of the policy of rapprochement and the prospects for interaction with China, constructive relations, readiness for bilateral cooperation and reduction of sociocultural distance are in demand.
Code 316.64
DOI 10.14530/reg.2019.3.80
Keywords host community ♦ social distance ♦ behavioral attitudes ♦ Chinese ♦ Buryatia ♦ interethnic relations ♦ China
Download 2019-03.80.pdf
For citation Dashibalova I.N. Attitude of the Residents of Buryatia to the Citizens of China: Views, Attitudes, Social Distance. Regionalistica [Regionalistics]. 2019. Vol. 6. No. 3. Pp. 80–88. DOI: 10.14530/reg.2019.3.80. (In Russian).
References 1. Gelbras V.G. Russia in the Context of Global Chinese Migration. Moscow, 2004. 203 p. (In Russian).
2. Grigoriev D.S., Batkhina A.A., Dubrov D.I. Assimilationism, Multiculturalism, Colorblindness and Polyculturalism in the Russian Context. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya [Cultural-Historical Psychology]. 2018. Vol. 14. No. 2. Pp. 53–65. DOI: 10.17759/chp.2018140206. (In Russian).
3. Kubarsky D.V. Psychological Features of the Perception of Chinese Migrants by the Russian Population of Khabarovsk. Prostranstvennaya economika = Spatial Economics. 2005. No. 2. Pp. 106–124. (In Russian)
4. Larin A.G. Russian-Chinese Relations and Chinese Migrants in the Assessment of Russians (Part 1). Problemy Dal'nego Vostoka [Problems of the Far East]. 2008. No. 5. Pp. 111–123. (In Russian)
5. Larin V.L., Larina L.L. East Asia in the Public Opinion in Russia’s Pacific (According to the Survey in 2013). Rossiya i ATR [Russia and the Pacific]. 2014. No. 2. Pp. 5–19. (In Russian)
6. Larin V.L., Larina L.L. Public Opinion of the Inhabitants of Pacific Russia toward China (According to Survey 2017). Rossiya i ATR [Russia and the Pacific]. 2018. No. 2. Pp. 5–33. DOI: 10.24411/1026-8804-2018-00017. (In Russian).
7. Lee W. Value System of Chinese Youth: The Comparative Analysis of Metropolitan and Regional Students’ Priorities. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Sotsiologiya [RUDN Journal of Sociology]. 2009. No. 4. Pp. 40–46. (In Russian)
8. Maksimov S.G., Morkovkina A.G. Civil and Ethnic Identities as Markers of Inter-Ethnic Relations in the Russian Border Regions. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Sotsiologiya [RUDN Journal of Sociology]. 2016. No. 2. Pp. 347–358. (In Russian)
9. Narbut N.P., Trotsuk I.V. Images of Neighboring Countries in the Perception of Students (Results of Sociological Studies). Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Sotsiologiya [RUDN Journal of Sociology]. 2011. No. 4. Pp. 109–117. (In Russian)
10. Tatarko A.N., Lebedeva N.M. Methods of Ethnic and Cross-Cultural Psychology. Moscow, 2011. 240 p. (In Russian)
11. Trofimova Ye.L., Terekhova T.A. Interethnic Interaction of Students from the APR Countries as a Condition of Psychological Security. Baikal Research Journal. 2017. Vol. 8. No. 4. DOI: 10.17150/2411-6262.2017.8(4).5. (In Russian).
12. Yankov A.G. Sino Phobia vs. Russo Phobia: Realities and Illusions. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2010. No. 3. Pp. 65–71. (In Russian)
Financing
Date
ECRIN
ERI FEB RAS		 2019-3
Issue's contents		 russian version
RUS
previous article Regionalistica 2019 Volume 6 number 3 pages 89-99 next article

 

Title of the article Leisure in the Shadow of Big City: Research Questions
Pages 89-99
Author Ukrainsky Vadim NikolaevichUkrainsky Vadim Nikolaevich
Ph.D. in economics, research fellow
Economic Research Institute FEB RAS
153, Tikhookeanskaya Street, Khabarovsk, Russia, 680042
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Abstract The article is concerned the issues that are related to the development of a research program devoted to the study of leisure of citizens in the suburbs. Attention is focused on the problems of conceptual and terminological nature, the definition of research focus and the use of relatively new analytical tools.
Code 332.1+316+91
DOI 10.14530/reg.2019.3.89
Keywords leisure ♦ leisure practice ♦ dachas ♦ vernacular areas ♦ competition of places
Download 2019-03.89.pdf
For citation Ukrainsky V.N. Leisure in the Shadow of Big City: Research Questions. Regionalistica [Regionalistics]. 2019. Vol. 6. No. 3. Pp. 89–99. DOI: 10.14530/reg.2019.3.89. (In Russian).
References 1. Brade I. Between Dacha and Fashionable Residence. View from the West. Izvestiya RAN. Seriya geograficheskaya [Proceedings of the RAS. Series: Geographical]. 2014. No. 4. Pp. 33–38. (In Russian)
2. Butenko I.A. Quality of Leisure Time among the Poor and the Rich. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 1998. No. 7. Pp. 82–89. (In Russian)
3. Vakhshtayn V., Maiatsky M. Contingent Labor – Forced Leisure. A Discussion. Logos. 2019. No. 1. Pp. 1–26. (In Russian)
4. Glaeser E. Triumph of the City: How Our Greatest Invention Makes Us Richer, Smarter, Greener, Healthier, and Happier. Moscow, 2014. 432 p. (In Russian)
5. Grigorichev K.V. From Settlement to Suburb: Outskirts of Irkutsk in the Last Third of the XXth – the Early XXIth Century. Izvestiya Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta Seriya «Politologiya. Religiovedenie» [The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series «Political Science and Religion Studies»]. 2012. No. 2–2. Pp. 44–51. (In Russian)
6. Grigorichev K.V. Transformation of the Economic Field of the Suburb of Irkutsk. Idei i idealy [Ideas and Ideals]. 2013. No. 4. Pp. 51–61. (In Russian)
7. Twenty Years of Reforms through the Eyes of Russians: The Experience of Long-Term Sociological Measurements. Moscow, 2011. 328 p. (In Russian)
8. Demyanenko A.N., Ukrainsky V.N. Competition in the Market of Places. Regionalistica [Regionalistics]. 2017. Vol. 4. No. 6. Pp. 70–76. (In Russian) DOI: 10.14530/reg.2017.6
9. Kazakov S.G. Economic-Geographical Features of Dachas near Kursk. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Estestvennye nauki [Bulletin of the Moscow Regional State University. Series: Natural Sciences]. 2019. No. 1. Pp. 92–102. DOI: 10.18384/2310-7189-2019-1-92-102. (In Russian).
10. Kazakova G.M. «The Vernacular Area» as Condition for the Intensification of Social Processes. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2017. № 9. Pp. 57–65. (In Russian)
11. Lovell S. Summerfolk: A History of the Dacha, 1710–2000. S.-Petersburg, 2008. 347 p. (In Russian)
12. Lovell S. Leisure in Russia: Free Time and Its Uses. Antropologicheskij forum [Forum for Anthropology and Culture]. 2005. No. 2. Pp. 136–173. (In Russian)
13. Malinkin A.N. Collector. Essay on Research in the Sociology of Culture. Moscow, 2011. 192 p. (In Russian)
14. Makhrova A.G. Seasonal Suburbanization in the Regions of Russia. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5. Geografiya [Moscow University Bulletin. Series 5. Geography]. 2015. No. 4. Pp. 60–68. (In Russian)
15. Nefedova T.G. Citizens and Dachas. Otechestvennye zapiski [Notes of the Fatherland]. 2012. No. 3. Pp. 204–216. (In Russian)
16. Nuksunova A.M. Leisure Behavior of Russians. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny [The Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes Journal]. 2010. No. 2. Pp. 231–246. (In Russian)
17. What the Russians Dream about: The Ideal and the Reality. Moscow, 2013. 400 p. (In Russian)
18. Pavlyuk S.G. Key Issues of the Study of Vernacular Areas. In: Territorial Structure of the Economy and Society of the Foreign World. Moscow–Smolensk, 2009. Pp. 46–56. (In Russian)
19. Patrushev V.D. Lifestyle: Trends in the Development of Free Time. In: Sociology and Problems of Social Development. Moscow, 1978. Pp. 241–252. (In Russian)
20. Puzanov K.A. Territorial Borders of Urban Communities. Sotsiologiya vlasti [Sociology of Power]. 2013. No. 3. Pp. 27–38. (In Russian)
21. Rozmainsky I.V., Lozhnikova A.V., Kichko N.I., Khloptsov D.M. Dacha in Post-Soviet Russia: Institutional Analysis. Journal of Institutional Studies. 2017. Vol. 9. No. 2. Pp. 63–79. DOI: 10.17835/2076-6297.2017.9.2.063-079. (In Russian).
22. Sedova N.N. Leisure-Time Activities of Russian Citizens. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2009. No. 12. Pp. 56–69. (In Russian)
23. Smirnyagin L.V. About Regional Identity. In: Changing Geography of the Foreign World. Moscow–Smolensk, 2007. Pp. 21–49. (In Russian)
24. Stebbins R.A. Free Time: Toward the Optimal Style of Leisure (A Look from Canada). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2000. No. 7. Pp. 64–72. (In Russian)
25. The Capitals and Regions of Modern Russia: Myths and Facts Fifteen Years Later. Moscow, 2018. 312 p. (In Russian)
26. Storper М. Keys to the City: How Economics, Institutions, Social Interaction, and Politics Shape Development. Мoscow, 2018. 368 p. (In Russian)
27. Treyvish A.I. «Dachevedenie» as the Science of the Second House in the West and in Russia. Izvestiya RAN. Seriya geograficheskaya [Proceedings of the RAS. Series: Geographical]. 2014. No. 4. Pp. 22–32. (In Russian)
28. Humphrey C. Post-Soviet Transformations in Asiatic Russia. Anthropological Sketches. Moscow, 2010. 384 p. (In Russian)
29. Hughes E.C. Work and Leisure. In: American Sociology: Perspectives, Problems, Methods. Moscow, 1972. Pp. 68–81. (In Russian)
30. What Do We Know about Contemporary Russian Suburbs? Ulan-Ude, 2017. 220 p. (In Russian)
31. Caldwell M.L. Dacha Idylls: Living Organically in Russia’s Countryside. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2011. 222 p.
32. Caldwell M.L. Dacha Labors: Preserving Everyday Soviet Life. In: Gender and Food in Late Soviet Everyday Life. Ed. by A. Lakhtikova, A. Brintlinger, I. Glushchenko. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2019. Pp. 165–192.
33. Dumazedier J. Ambiguity of Leisure and Socio-Cultural Dynamics. Cahiers internationaux de sociologie [International Notebooks of Sociology]. 1957. Vol. 22. Pp. 75–96. (In French)
34. Elkington S. Disturbance and Complexity in Urban Places: The Everyday Aesthetics of Leisure. In: Landscapes of Leisure: Space, Place and Identities. Ed. by S. Gammon, S. Elkington. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. Pp. 24–40.
35. Soule G. The Economics of Leisure. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 1957. Vol. 313. Pp. 16–24. DOI: 10.1177/000271625731300106
36. Stebbins R.A. Casual Leisure: A Conceptual Statement. Leisure Studies. 1997. Vol. 16. № 1. Pp. 17–25. DOI: 10.1080/026143697375485
37. Stebbins R.A. Leisure Activities in Context: A Micro-Macro/Agency-Structure Interpretation of Leisure. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 2016. 197 p.
38. Tarde G. Economic Psychologe. Vol. 1. Paris: Felix Alcan, 1902. 383 p. (In French)
Financing  
Date  
ECRIN
ERI FEB RAS		 2019-3
Issue's contents		 russian version
RUS
previous article Regionalistica 2019 Volume 6 number 3 pages 66-79 next article

Title of the article The Assessment of Trade Barriers within Prospective Integration Unions in the Asia-Pacific Region
Pages 66-79
Author Tomilov Mikhail VladimirovichTomilov Mikhail Vladimirovich
junior researcher
Economic Research Institute FEB RAS
153, Tikhookeanskaya Street, Khabarovsk, Russia, 680042
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Abstract The article represents the assessment of interregional trade barriers within integration unions in the Asia-Pacific region made by APR trade gravitation model construction and the estimation of border effect based on it. As a result it is concluded that considered blocs (The Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership, Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership) have a small potential in terms of possible effects for their participants after reducing trade barriers within these groups. In order to achieve some tangible effects the agreements on the establishment of considered unions should be qualitatively different from existing bilateral and multilateral trade formats.
Code 339.92+339.54
DOI 10.14530/reg.2019.3.66
Keywords trade integration ♦ trade barriers ♦ gravitation model ♦ border effect ♦ APR ♦ CPTPP ♦ RCEP
Download 2019-03.66.pdf
For citation Tomilov M.V. The Assessment of Trade Barriers within Prospective Integration Unions in the Asia-Pacific Region. Regionalistica [Regionalistics]. 2019. Vol. 6. No. 3. Pp. 66–79. DOI: 10.14530/reg.2019.3.66. (In Russian).
References 1. Izotov D.A. Integration Processes in the Аsia-Рacific Region: Dynamic and Structural Changes. Izvestiya Dalnevostochnogo federalnogo universiteta. Economika i upravleniye [Far Eastern Federal University Bulletin. Economics and Management]. 2016. No. 3. Pp. 86–100. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.163479. (In Russian).
2. Kostyunina G.M. Integration Models of East Asian Community Formation. Rossiyskiy vneshneekonomicheskiy vestnik [Russian Foreign-Economic Bulletin]. 2015. No. 5. Pp. 33–48. (in Russian)
3. Potapov M.A. Economic Integration in the Asia-Pacific: in Search of Model. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [World Economy and International Relations]. 2017. Vol. 61. No. 11. Pp. 57–65. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2017-61-11-57-65. (In Russian).
4. Tomilov M.V. Institutional Change within Trans-Pacific Partnership. In: Territorial Studies: Goals, Results and Perspectives. Theses of IX Russian Scientific Conference of Young Researches, Birobidzhan, October 3–4, 2017. Ed. by Ye.Ya. Frisman, N.G. Bazhenova, D.M. Fetisov, M.Yu. Havinson, A.V. Dosova. Birobidzhan, 2017. Pp. 96–99. (In Russian)
5. Tomilov M.V. Configuration of Free Trade Zones in the Asia-Pacific Region: Comparison of Integration Potentials. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika = Spatial Economics. 2019. Vol. 15. No. 1. Pp. 84–106. DOI: 10.14530/se.2019.1.084-106. (In Russian).
6. Tomilov M.V. Agriculture Regulation within Trans-Pacific Partnership. In: Young Researches to Khabarovskiy Kray: Theses of XIX Regional Competition of Young Researches and Postgraduates, Khabarovsk, January 13–20, 2017. Khabarovsk, 2017. Pp. 37–42. (In Russian)
7. Shumilov A.V. Estimating Gravity Models of International Trade: A Survey of Methods. Ekonomicheskiy zhurnal VShE [HSE Economic Journal]. 2017. Vol. 21. No. 2. Pp. 224–250. (In Russian)
8. Anderson J.E., van Wincoop E. Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle. American Economic Review. 2003. Vol. 93. No. 1. Рp. 170–192. DOI: 10.1257/000282803321455214
9. Baldwin R., Taglioni D. Trade Effects of the Euro: A Comparison of Estimators. Journal of Economic Integration. 2007. Vol. 22. No. 4. Рp. 780–818. DOI: 10.11130/jei.2007.22.4.780
10. Balistreri E.J., Hillberry R.H. Structural Estimation and the Border Puzzle. Journal of International Economics. 2007. Vol. 72. No. 2. Pp. 451–463. DOI: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2007.01.001
11. Cimino-Isaacs C., Schott J.J. Trans-Pacific Partnership: An Assessment. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2016. 369 p.
12. Coughlin C., Novy D. Estimating Border Effects: The Impact of Spatial Aggregation. CEPR Discussion Papers. 2016. No. 11226. 57 p. DOI: 10.20955/wp.2016.006
13. Coughlin C., Novy D. Is the International Border Effect Larger than the Domestic Border Effect? Evidence from U.S. Trade. CESifo Economic Studies. 2013. No. 59. Pp. 249–276. DOI: 10.1093/cesifo/ifs002
14. Evans C. Border Effects and the Availability of Domestic Products Abroad. Canadian Journal of Economics. 2006. Vol. 39. No. 1. Pp. 211–246. DOI: 10.1111/j.0008-4085.2006.00345.x
15. Evans C. The Economic Significance of National Border Effects. American Economic Review. 2003. Vol. 93. No. 4. Pp. 1291–1312. DOI: 10.1257/000282803769206304
16. Fergusson I.F., McMinimy M.A., Williams B.R. The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP): In Brief. Available at: https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R44278.pdf (accessed 10 December 2018).
17. Fergusson I.F., Williams B.R. TPP Countries near Agreement without U.S. Participation. Available at: https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/IN10822.pdf (accessed 10 December 2018).
18. Gorodnichenko Y., Tesar L. Border Effect or Country Effect? Seattle May Not Be So Far from Vancouver After All. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics. 2009. Vol. 1. No. 1. Pp. 219–241. DOI: 10.1257/mac.1.1.219
19. Havranek T., Irsova Z. Do Borders Really Slash Trade? A Meta-Analysis. IMF Economic Review. 2017. Vol. 65. No. 2. Pp. 365–396. DOI: 10.1057/s41308-016-0001-5
20. Head K., Mayer T. Illusory Border Effects: Distance Mismeasurement Inflates Estimates of Home Bias in Trade. CEPII Working Paper. 2002. No. 1. 32 p.
21. Helliwell J.F. National Borders, Trade, and Migration. Pacific Economic Review. 1997. Vol. 2. No. 3. Рp. 165–185. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0106.00032
22. Helliwell J. Do National Borders Matter for Quebec’s Trade? Canadian Journal of Economics 1996. Vol. 29. No. 3. Pp. 507–522.
23. Helliwell J., Schembri L. Borders, Common Currencies, Trade, and Welfare: What Can We Learn From the Evidence? Bank of Canada Review. 2005. Spring. Pp. 19–33.
24. Helliwell J., Verdier G. Measuring Internal Trade Distances: A New Method Applied to Estimate Provincial Border Effects in Canada. Canadian Journal of Economics. 2001. Vol. 34. No. 4. Pp. 1024–1041. DOI: 10.1111/0008-4085.00111
25. Magerman G., Studnicka Z., Van Hove J. Distance and Border Effects in International Trade: A Comparison of Estimation Methods. Available at: http://www.economics-ejournal.org/ economics/discussionpapers/2015-69 (accessed 10 December 2018).
26. McCallum J. National Borders Matter: Canada-U.S. Regional Trade Patterns. American Economic Review. 1995. Vol. 85. No. 3. Рp. 615–623.
27. Nitsch V. National Borders and International Trade: Evidence from the European Union. Canadian Journal of Economics. 2000. Vol. 33. No. 4. Pp. 1091–1105. DOI: 10.1111/0008-4085.00055
28. Obstfeld M., Rogoff K. The Six Major Puzzles in International Macroeconomics: Is There a Common Cause? NBER Macroeconomics Annual. 2000. Vol. 15. No. 1. Pp. 339–390. DOI: 10.1086/654423
29. Sanchita B.D. RCEP and TPP: Comparisons and Concerns. ISEAS Perspective. 2013. No. 2. Pp. 202–213.
30. Schott J., Cimino-Isaacs C., Jung E. Implication of the Trans-Pacific Partnership for the World Trading System. Available at: https://piie.com/system/files/documents/pb16-8.pdf (accessed 10 December 2018).
31. Toshihiro O. The Border Effect in the Japanese Market: A Gravity Model Analysis. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies. 2004. Vol. 18. No. 1. Pp. 1–11. DOI: 10.1016/S0889-1583(03)00047-9
32. Wei S. Intra-National Versus International Trade: How Stubborn are Nations in Global Integration? NBER Working Paper. № 5531. DOI: 10.3386/w5531
33. Wolf H. Patterns of Intra- and Inter-State Trade. NBER Working Paper. № 5939. DOI: 10.3386/w5939
34. Zhu H., Gu H. China-US Border Effect of Agricultural Trade Using Gravity Model. Computer and Computing Technologies in Agriculture II. 2009. Vol. 2. Pp. 891–900. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-0211-5_12
Financing
Date

Баннер

Лицензия Creative Commons
Если не указано другое, контент этого сайта доступен по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.